Difference between revisions of "The Sounds of Silence- Cross-World Communication and the Auditory Arts in African Societies"
(→Discussion about this article) |
(→Discussion about this article) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Please feel free to edit this section(click edit just above and to the right); type your comments here and sign them using the signature button. Don't forget to log in prior to editing. Alt-S will save your changes in lieu of clicking the button below. Leave one blank line between your discussion entries. | Please feel free to edit this section(click edit just above and to the right); type your comments here and sign them using the signature button. Don't forget to log in prior to editing. Alt-S will save your changes in lieu of clicking the button below. Leave one blank line between your discussion entries. | ||
--[[User:Michaelf|mf]] 17:18, 13 January 2006 (MST) | --[[User:Michaelf|mf]] 17:18, 13 January 2006 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | This might not be totally relevant, but it's something I thought of while doing this reading. The author seems to make certain assumptions about the beliefs of the people he's studying, namely that those beliefs are true. For example, that we can communicate with 'otherworld' beings and know what they sound like, let alone know that they exist, is taken for granted. Is this an example of treating sources as references? Is there a certain extent to which we need to make these kinds of assumptions when studying music and religion?--[[User:Gloria|Gloria]] 09:33, 19 January 2006 (MST) | ||
Revision as of 10:33, 19 January 2006
The Sounds of Silence- Cross-World Communication and the Auditory Arts in African Societies
Discussion about this article
Please feel free to edit this section(click edit just above and to the right); type your comments here and sign them using the signature button. Don't forget to log in prior to editing. Alt-S will save your changes in lieu of clicking the button below. Leave one blank line between your discussion entries. --mf 17:18, 13 January 2006 (MST)
This might not be totally relevant, but it's something I thought of while doing this reading. The author seems to make certain assumptions about the beliefs of the people he's studying, namely that those beliefs are true. For example, that we can communicate with 'otherworld' beings and know what they sound like, let alone know that they exist, is taken for granted. Is this an example of treating sources as references? Is there a certain extent to which we need to make these kinds of assumptions when studying music and religion?--Gloria 09:33, 19 January 2006 (MST)
