Difference between revisions of "Music and Documentary Filmmaking (Winter 2011)"

From CCE wiki archived
Jump to: navigation, search
(Requirements/assignments)
 
(29 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
==Course description==
 
==Course description==
  
This course examines a variety of experiences, techniques, philosophies and understandings of documentary filmmaking through the specific lens of music. It considers both documentaries about music and the use of music in documentary films on other subjects. Spanning TV productions, art films and film ethnographies, the course draws on film studies, visual anthropology and ethnomusicology to provide an interpretive frame and a critical forum for students to engage thoughtfully with documentary filmmaking. In particular, music will be taken as the vantage point to look at issues of representation in audiovisual media as well as to explore documentary filmmaking as both a creative and a research process. Class instruction will include discussion of assigned readings, and in-class viewings and analyses.
+
This course examines a variety of experiences, techniques, philosophies and understandings of documentary filmmaking through the specific lens of music. It considers both documentaries about music and the use of music in documentary films on other subjects. Spanning TV productions, art films and film ethnographies, the course draws on film studies, visual anthropology and ethnomusicology to provide an interpretive frame and a critical forum for students to engage thoughtfully with documentary filmmaking. In particular, music will be taken as the vantage point to look at issues of representation in audiovisual media as well as to explore documentary filmmaking as both a creative and a research process. Class instruction will include discussion of assigned readings, and in-class viewings and analyses. [[Media:Spinetti_Music_466-566_Winter_2011_Syllabus.pdf]]
  
 
==Prerequisites==
 
==Prerequisites==
Line 33: Line 33:
 
* '''Attendance and participation''', including completing weekly readings and participating in class discussions. Completing weekly readings before coming to class is an essential requirement for this course. You may be invited to take turns in leading the discussion on specific readings, topics or in-class film screenings.  
 
* '''Attendance and participation''', including completing weekly readings and participating in class discussions. Completing weekly readings before coming to class is an essential requirement for this course. You may be invited to take turns in leading the discussion on specific readings, topics or in-class film screenings.  
  
* '''Reading review''' (500–750 words) of a reading of your choice taken from the bibliography for this course (only readings marked with + in the bibliography below). Though short, your review needs to be polished and show some critical acumen. It should summarize the reading in question as well as identify and briefly critique its main arguments and themes. The review is due in Week 4. Unjustified late submissions will be penalized by one full point on the letter grading scale (i.e. from A to A-, from A- to B+, etc). Please submit your piece by email (in .doc or .docx format).
+
* '''Film excerpt analysis''' (approx. 500–750 words). Take a 5 to 7 minute excerpt (e.g a scene or a chapter) of a documentary film of your choice (from the Library online databases) and analyze it according to two main tasks: 1) compile a comprehensive list of all shots contained in your excerpt and provide a short, but fairly detailed description of their visual and audio content; 2) Respond to the following questions: What information does your excerpt convey (i.e. what do we learn from it)? How does your excerpt convey such information (i.e. how do we get to learn what we learn)? In order to address this second question, pay particular attention to representational mode and treatment of sound/music (e.g. how does sound help us to see what we see (i.e. to “audioview”)? How is sound combined (empathetically or not) with visual materials? What is the sound’s “added value”?). This assignment due in Week 4 (Thursday, Feb 3).
  
* '''Comparative review''' (500–750 words) of 2 documentary film reviews of your choice. One review must be taken from an ethnomusicology journal (such as Ethnomusicoloy, Ethnomusicology Forum or Yearbook for Traditional Music), while the other one must be taken from an anthropology journal (such as Visual Anthropology Review or Visual Anthropology) or film studies journal (such as Film Criticism, Film & History or Film Quarterly). Your review should detect the critical focus, interpretive moves and theoretical interests of the reviewed authors, highlighting similarities and contrasts when relevant. This review is due in Week 7. Unjustified late submissions will be penalized by one full point on the letter grading scale (i.e. from A to A-, from A- to B+, etc). Please submit your piece by email (in .doc or .docx format).
+
* EITHER a '''Reading review''' (500–750 words) of a reading of your choice taken from the bibliography for this course (only readings marked with + in the bibliography below). Though short, your review needs to be polished and show some critical acumen. It should summarize the reading in question as well as identify and briefly critique its main arguments and themes. The review is due in Week 7. Unjustified late submissions will be penalized by one full point on the letter grading scale (i.e. from A to A-, from A- to B+, etc). Please submit your piece by email (in .doc or .docx format).
 +
 
 +
OR a '''Comparative review''' (500–750 words) of 2 documentary film reviews of your choice. One review must be taken from an ethnomusicology journal (such as Ethnomusicoloy, Ethnomusicology Forum or Yearbook for Traditional Music), while the other one must be taken either from an anthropology/film studies journal (such as Visual Anthropology Review, Visual Anthropology, Film Criticism, Film & History, or Film Quarterly) or from a journalistic film criticism publication (whether printed or online). Your review should detect the critical focus, interpretive moves and theoretical interests of the reviewed authors, highlighting similarities and contrasts when relevant. This review is due in Week 7. Unjustified late submissions will be penalized by one full point on the letter grading scale (i.e. from A to A-, from A- to B+, etc). Please submit your piece by email (in .doc or .docx format).
  
 
* '''Film review''' (undergraduate: 1,000–1,500 words; graduate: 1,500–2,000 words) of one documentary feature film or two to three short/medium length films of your choice. You must choose your film/s from the course filmography. Before undertaking your writing, please discuss with me your film choice. Your review should be polished and show critical acumen. It should provide a synopsis of the film in question and identify and critique its main representational, narrative and stylistic features, with special consideration for how music is used and/or represented. The review is due in Week 10. Unjustified late submissions will be penalized by one full point on the letter grading scale (i.e. from A to A-, from A- to B+, etc). Please submit your piece by email (in .doc or .docx format).
 
* '''Film review''' (undergraduate: 1,000–1,500 words; graduate: 1,500–2,000 words) of one documentary feature film or two to three short/medium length films of your choice. You must choose your film/s from the course filmography. Before undertaking your writing, please discuss with me your film choice. Your review should be polished and show critical acumen. It should provide a synopsis of the film in question and identify and critique its main representational, narrative and stylistic features, with special consideration for how music is used and/or represented. The review is due in Week 10. Unjustified late submissions will be penalized by one full point on the letter grading scale (i.e. from A to A-, from A- to B+, etc). Please submit your piece by email (in .doc or .docx format).
Line 75: Line 77:
 
* Attendance and participation: 10%
 
* Attendance and participation: 10%
  
* Reading review: 15%
+
* Film excerpt analysis: 15%
  
* Comparative review: 15%
+
* Reading review OR Comparative review: 15%
  
 
* Film review: 20%
 
* Film review: 20%
Line 91: Line 93:
 
Most films viewed in class will be available on reserve at the Music Library or online. The following online film databases will be particularly useful:
 
Most films viewed in class will be available on reserve at the Music Library or online. The following online film databases will be particularly useful:
  
* NFB.ca (National Film Board of Canada) [access through UofA Library databases]
+
* NFB.ca (National Film Board of Canada). Access through UofA Library databases [http://www.library.ualberta.ca/databases_help/nfb/index.cfm here]
  
* Films on Demand [access through Uof A Library databases]
+
* Films on Demand. Access through UofA Library databases [http://www.library.ualberta.ca.login.ezproxy.library.ualberta.ca/databases_help/films_on_demand/index.cfm here]
  
* Europa Film Treasures [access through Uof A Library databases]
+
* Europa Film Treasures. Access through UofA Library databases [http://www.europafilmtreasures.eu/ here]
  
* Culture Unplugged online festivals (www.cultureunplugged.com)
+
* Culture Unplugged online festivals (http://www.cultureunplugged.com)
  
 
==Academic integrity==
 
==Academic integrity==
Line 107: Line 109:
 
==Class schedule and readings==
 
==Class schedule and readings==
  
==Bibliography==
+
[[Week 1 – Jan 11 and 13: Introduction to the course: documentary film and music]]
 
 
Aufderheide, Patricia. Documentary film: a very short introduction. Oxford/New
 
York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
 
 
 
Bachmann, Gideon. “The Man on the Volcano: A Portrait of Werner Herzog.” Film
 
Quarterly, 31/1, 1977, pp. 2-10.
 
 
 
* Baily, John. “Filmmaking as Musical Ethnography.” The World of Music, 31/1, 1989,
 
pp. 3-20.
 
 
 
Baily, John. The making of Amir: An Afghan Refugee Musician's Life in Peshawar, Pakistan. The Study Guide. Boston: Documentary Educational Resources, 1990.
 
 
 
* Baily, John. “The Art of the ‘Fieldwork Movie’: 35 Years of Making Ethnomusicological Films.” Ethnomusicology Forum, Volume 18/1, 2009, pp. 55-64.
 
 
 
Banks, M. and H. Morphy (eds.). Rethinking Visual Anthropology. New Haven, CT:
 
Yale University Press, 1997.
 
 
 
Barbash, Ilisa. Cross-cultural filmmaking: a handbook for making documentary and
 
ethnographic films and videos. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997.
 
 
 
Barnouw, Erik. Documentary: a history of the non-fiction film. New York: Oxford Unviersity Press, 1993.
 
 
 
Barsam, Richard. Nonfiction film: a critical history. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992.
 
 
 
Beattie, Keith. Documentary display: re-viewing nonfiction film and video. London: Wallflower, 2008.
 
 
 
Bruzzi, Stella. New Documentary: A Critical Introduction. London and New York: Routledge, 2000.
 
 
 
Chion, Michel. Audio-vision: sound on screen. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.
 
 
 
Chion, Michel. Film, a sound art. New York: Columbia University Press, 2009.
 
 
 
Crawford, P. and D. Turton (eds.). Film as Ethnography. Manchester: Manchester
 
University Press, 1992.
 
 
 
* De Brigard, Emilie. “The History of Ethnographic Film.” In Paul Hockings (ed.) Principles of Visual Anthropology. 2nd edition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1995 [1975], pp. 13-43.
 
 
 
Devereaux, Leslie and Roger Hillman. Fields of vision: essays in film studies, visual
 
anthropology, and photography. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.
 
 
 
Fabian, Joannes. Time and the Other: How Anthropology makes its Other. New York: Columbia University Press, 1983.
 
 
 
* Feld, Steven. “Ethnomusicology and Visual Communication.” Ethnomusicology,
 
20/2, 1976, pp. 293-325.
 
  
Grimshaw, Anna and Amanda Ravetz. Observational cinema: anthropology, film, and the exploration of social life. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2009.
+
[[Week 2 – Jan 18 and 20: Sound in (documentary) film]]
  
Heider, Karl G. Ethnographic Film. Austin and London: University of Texas Press, 1976.
+
[[Week 3 – Jan 25 and 27: Fine lines I: fiction and documentary]]
  
Hewitt, John. Documentary Filmmaking: a contemporary film guide. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
+
[[Week 4 – Feb 1 and 3: Observational cinema and the moving image in Anthropology I]]
  
* MacDougall, David. “The visual in anthropology.” In M. Banks and H. Morphy (eds.). Rethinking Visual Anthropology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1997, pp. 276-295.
+
[[Week 5 – Feb 8 and 10: Observational cinema and the moving image in Anthropology II]]
  
MacDougall, David. The corporeal image: film, ethnography, and the senses. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006.
+
[[Week 6 – Feb 15 and 17: The moving image in Ethnomusicology I]]
Nichols, Bill. Representing Reality: Issues and Concepts in Documentary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991.
 
  
Pink, Sarah, László Kürti and Ana Isabel Afonso (eds.). Working images: visual
+
Reading Week - February 21-25
research and representation in ethnography. London / New York: Routledge, 2004.
 
  
Prager, Brad. The cinema of Werner Herzog: Aesthetic Ecstasy and Truth. London:  
+
[[Week 7 – March 1 and 3: The moving image in Ethnomusicology II]]
Wallflower Press, 2007.
 
  
Rabiger, Michael. Directing the documentary. 5th edition. Amsterdam/Boston: Focal
+
[[Week 8 – March 8 and 10: Documentary film and performative action: rockumentary]]
Press/Elsevier, 2009.
 
  
* Rouch, Jean. “The Camera and Man.” Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication, 1/1, 1974, pp. 37-44. Also in Paul Hockings (ed.) Principles of Visual Anthropology. 2nd edition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1995 [1975], pp. 79-98.
+
[[Week 9 – March 15 and 17: Werner Herzog, and other experiments with music and documentary]]
  
Rouch, Jean. Ciné-ethnography. Edited and translated by Steven Feld. Minneapolis:  
+
[[Week 10 – March 22 and 24: Fine lines II: Pontecorvo’s The Battle of Algiers and other stories]]
University of Minnesota Press, 2003.
 
  
Ruby, Jay. Picturing culture: explorations of film and anthropology. Chicago: Chicago
+
[[Week 11 – March 29 and 31: Evaluation week & film screenings]].
University Press, 2000.
 
  
* Ruby, Jay. “The moral burden of authorship in ethnographic film.” Visual Anthropology Review, 11/2, 1995, pp. 77-82.
+
[[Week 12 – April 5 and 7: Ethics in documentary filmmaking]]
  
Said, Edward. “The quest for Gillo Pontecorvo.” In Edward Said, Reflections on Exile
+
[[Week 13 – April 12: Final discussion.]]
and Other Essays. Cmabridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000, pp. 282-292.
 
  
Slobin, Mark (ed). Global Soundtracks: worlds of film music. Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan
 
University Press, 2008.
 
  
Solinas, Franco. Gillo Pontecorvo’s The Battle of Algiers. New York: Scribner, 1973.
+
[[Schedule of presentations - Music 466/566 2011]]
  
Titon, Jeff Todd. “Style and Meaning in Contemporary Documentary Film.”
 
Appalachian Journal, 20, 1992, pp. 44-55.
 
  
* Wissler, Holly. “Grief-Singing and the Camera: The Challenges and Ethics of Documentary Production in an Indigenous Andean Community.” Ethnomusicology Forum, Volume 18/1, 2009, pp. 37-53.
+
'''Final creative/research paper due on April 20th.'''
  
* Young, Colin. “Observational Cinema.” In Paul Hockings (ed.) Principles of Visual Anthropology. 2nd edition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1995 [1975], pp. 99-113.
+
==Sources==
  
* Zemp, Hugo. “Filming Music and Looking at Music Films.” Ethnomusicology, 32/3,
+
[[Bibliography - Music 466/566]]
1988, pp. 393-427.
 
  
==Filmography==
+
[[Filmography - Music 466/566]]

Latest revision as of 20:11, 31 January 2011

Classes: Tuesday and Thursday 2:00PM – 3:20PM

Location: HC 2-26

Instructor: Federico Spinetti www.ualberta.ca/~spinetti

Office: 3-34A Arts & Convocation Hall; office hours: Tuesday 11:00AM – 1:00PM; tel. 492-7534; email: spinetti@ualberta.ca

Course description

This course examines a variety of experiences, techniques, philosophies and understandings of documentary filmmaking through the specific lens of music. It considers both documentaries about music and the use of music in documentary films on other subjects. Spanning TV productions, art films and film ethnographies, the course draws on film studies, visual anthropology and ethnomusicology to provide an interpretive frame and a critical forum for students to engage thoughtfully with documentary filmmaking. In particular, music will be taken as the vantage point to look at issues of representation in audiovisual media as well as to explore documentary filmmaking as both a creative and a research process. Class instruction will include discussion of assigned readings, and in-class viewings and analyses. Media:Spinetti_Music_466-566_Winter_2011_Syllabus.pdf

Prerequisites

This course is for graduate and advanced undergraduate students. No previous knowledge of music notation, ethnomusicology, music scholarship in general, film studies or visual anthropology is required to take this course and to effectively complete its assignments/requirements.

Objectives

  • To familiarize students with the technical and creative process of documentary filmmaking, with an emphasis on issues of representation of real life.
  • To encourage students to take up a critical understanding of documentary filmmaking.
  • To consider the socio-political, cultural and technological contexts of the production of documentary films, and to appreciate their significance for the making, direction and philosophical approach of specific documentary films.
  • To examine the representation of musical life, music making and musicians in documentary films from a variety of periods and artistic/research perspectives.
  • To explore documentary filmmaking as a research process, research output and art form, and to assess its significance for the ethnographic study of music.
  • To address the role of music soundtrack in the representational and narrative strategies of documentary film.

Requirements/assignments

  • Attendance and participation, including completing weekly readings and participating in class discussions. Completing weekly readings before coming to class is an essential requirement for this course. You may be invited to take turns in leading the discussion on specific readings, topics or in-class film screenings.
  • Film excerpt analysis (approx. 500–750 words). Take a 5 to 7 minute excerpt (e.g a scene or a chapter) of a documentary film of your choice (from the Library online databases) and analyze it according to two main tasks: 1) compile a comprehensive list of all shots contained in your excerpt and provide a short, but fairly detailed description of their visual and audio content; 2) Respond to the following questions: What information does your excerpt convey (i.e. what do we learn from it)? How does your excerpt convey such information (i.e. how do we get to learn what we learn)? In order to address this second question, pay particular attention to representational mode and treatment of sound/music (e.g. how does sound help us to see what we see (i.e. to “audioview”)? How is sound combined (empathetically or not) with visual materials? What is the sound’s “added value”?). This assignment due in Week 4 (Thursday, Feb 3).
  • EITHER a Reading review (500–750 words) of a reading of your choice taken from the bibliography for this course (only readings marked with + in the bibliography below). Though short, your review needs to be polished and show some critical acumen. It should summarize the reading in question as well as identify and briefly critique its main arguments and themes. The review is due in Week 7. Unjustified late submissions will be penalized by one full point on the letter grading scale (i.e. from A to A-, from A- to B+, etc). Please submit your piece by email (in .doc or .docx format).

OR a Comparative review (500–750 words) of 2 documentary film reviews of your choice. One review must be taken from an ethnomusicology journal (such as Ethnomusicoloy, Ethnomusicology Forum or Yearbook for Traditional Music), while the other one must be taken either from an anthropology/film studies journal (such as Visual Anthropology Review, Visual Anthropology, Film Criticism, Film & History, or Film Quarterly) or from a journalistic film criticism publication (whether printed or online). Your review should detect the critical focus, interpretive moves and theoretical interests of the reviewed authors, highlighting similarities and contrasts when relevant. This review is due in Week 7. Unjustified late submissions will be penalized by one full point on the letter grading scale (i.e. from A to A-, from A- to B+, etc). Please submit your piece by email (in .doc or .docx format).

  • Film review (undergraduate: 1,000–1,500 words; graduate: 1,500–2,000 words) of one documentary feature film or two to three short/medium length films of your choice. You must choose your film/s from the course filmography. Before undertaking your writing, please discuss with me your film choice. Your review should be polished and show critical acumen. It should provide a synopsis of the film in question and identify and critique its main representational, narrative and stylistic features, with special consideration for how music is used and/or represented. The review is due in Week 10. Unjustified late submissions will be penalized by one full point on the letter grading scale (i.e. from A to A-, from A- to B+, etc). Please submit your piece by email (in .doc or .docx format).
  • Film presentation – starting from Week 7, each of you will be required to give one 15-minute class presentation on a film of your choice. This must not be the film chosen for your review and must be chosen from outside the course filmography. In your presentation, you should play some excerpts of the film for the class and comment on the pro-filmic, stylistic, representational, interpretive and narrative choices of the filmmaker, with special consideration for how music is used and/or represented. The time devoted to film excerpts should not exceed that of your commentary. The schedule of presentations will be determined before reading week.
  • Final creative/research paper. An original proposal for a documentary film on a subject of interest to you. Like a director, you should describe your chosen topic and reflect on the filmmaking choices with which you would approach your work. You should pay particular attention to illustrating your philosophical/conceptual standpoint, your cinematography and editing choices, your treatment of sound and/or music, and your envisaged working relationships with research subjects (whether participants or places/objects). Your paper should show familiarity with the topics and issues tackled in the course, and draw pertinent connections to and actively engage with course readings and viewings to support and illustrate your choices. Length of paper: undergraduate: 2,500-3,000 words; graduate 3,000-3,500 words. This paper is due on April 20. No unjustified late submissions will be accepted. Please submit your piece by email (in .doc or .docx format).

Assessment

Each assignment will be marked according to the numeric scale of evaluation given below. Individual assignment marks will be combined to obtain a final numeric grade, which will be rounded so as to obtain a corresponding final letter grade as shown below.

A = 4.0

A- = 3.7

B+ = 3.3

B = 3.0

B- = 2.7

C+ = 2.3

C = 2.0

C- = 1.7

D+ = 1.3

D = 1.0

D- = 0.7

F = 0.0

The relative weight of each assignment on the overall grade is as follows:

  • Attendance and participation: 10%
  • Film excerpt analysis: 15%
  • Reading review OR Comparative review: 15%
  • Film review: 20%
  • Presentation: 15%
  • Final creative/research paper: 25%

Resources

There are no required textbooks for this course. Class readings will be on reserve at the Music Library or available online through the Library databases. Relevant bibliographic materials that may not be available on reserve will be handed out in class or included in this course mediawiki page. I will use the course mediawiki to post updated reading assignments and changes of schedule.

Most films viewed in class will be available on reserve at the Music Library or online. The following online film databases will be particularly useful:

  • NFB.ca (National Film Board of Canada). Access through UofA Library databases here
  • Films on Demand. Access through UofA Library databases here
  • Europa Film Treasures. Access through UofA Library databases here

Academic integrity

You should be familiar with the Code of Student Behavior as published in Section 26 of the 2009-2010 Calendar and available online at http://www.uofaweb.ualberta.ca/governance/studentappeals.cfm. “Policy about course outlines can be found in section 23.4(2) of the University Calendar”. (GFC 29 SEP 2003) “The University of Alberta is committed to the highest standards of academic integrity and honesty. Students are expected to be familiar with these standards regarding academic honesty and to uphold the policies of the University in this respect. Students are particularly urged to familiarize themselves the provisions of the Code of Student Behaviour (online at http://www.uofaweb.ualberta.ca/governance/studentappeals.cfm.) and avoid any behaviour which could potentially result in suspicions of cheating, plagiarism, misrepresentation of facts and/or participation in an offence. Academic dishonesty is a serious offence and can result in suspension or expulsion from the University.” (GFC 29 SEP 2003)

Class schedule and readings

Week 1 – Jan 11 and 13: Introduction to the course: documentary film and music

Week 2 – Jan 18 and 20: Sound in (documentary) film

Week 3 – Jan 25 and 27: Fine lines I: fiction and documentary

Week 4 – Feb 1 and 3: Observational cinema and the moving image in Anthropology I

Week 5 – Feb 8 and 10: Observational cinema and the moving image in Anthropology II

Week 6 – Feb 15 and 17: The moving image in Ethnomusicology I

Reading Week - February 21-25

Week 7 – March 1 and 3: The moving image in Ethnomusicology II

Week 8 – March 8 and 10: Documentary film and performative action: rockumentary

Week 9 – March 15 and 17: Werner Herzog, and other experiments with music and documentary

Week 10 – March 22 and 24: Fine lines II: Pontecorvo’s The Battle of Algiers and other stories

Week 11 – March 29 and 31: Evaluation week & film screenings.

Week 12 – April 5 and 7: Ethics in documentary filmmaking

Week 13 – April 12: Final discussion.


Schedule of presentations - Music 466/566 2011


Final creative/research paper due on April 20th.

Sources

Bibliography - Music 466/566

Filmography - Music 466/566