Article Item Type Metadata
Thought and Expression in Spinoza and Shankara
Philosophers from traditions that are not only entirely different but apparently uninfluenced by each other sometimes show remarkable similarities. In the case of Spinoza and Shankara such similarities include the dual-aspect model according to which the apparent pluralism of the world rests on an inadequate perception of its oneness, and the way the overcoming of that inadequacy is conceived as a liberation from the passions and an achievement of immortality. A significant difference between the two, however, is that Spinoza’s explanations are epistemologically conceived while Shankara’s are conceived ontologically. Not that Spinoza lacked an ontology or Shankara an epistemology, but rather their explanatory approaches emphasize the differences of the worlds within which they wrote.
Volume 18, Issue 1, Spring 2014
“Dorter's Article,” Symposium, accessed August 8, 2020, http://www.artsrn.ualberta.ca/symposium/items/show/379.